Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id OAA19734 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 14:38:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzugk21611; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 14:30:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA28439; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:54:31 -0500
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:54:31 -0500
Message-Id: <9512151807.AA10191@sutm.2sprint.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: mward@sutm.2sprint.net (Marcus Ward)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Out to Video
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>And since the PVR has a direct SCSI-2 connection to its drive, it
>outperforms ANY card that sends video over the system bus, and even the
>system buses themselves!
One thing I would like to append to my message, the pvr does manage to
exceed scsi2 speeds when sending output to video. It would have to, as full
speed video frames at 30 per second is more than 40 MB per second. I have no
idea how it does this, not owning one, but it does. I am pretty sure that it